The combat at
Grimbergen August 23rd 1745
I continue my series about the campaign in
Flanders 275 years ago. (The post is online a little too early because I'm offline 23 August 2020.)
The background
The maréchal de Saxe thought that his army had
done enough for the year 1745[1].
However as before he could not go into his quarters in summer. The fall of
Dendermonde on August 13th changed the situation dramatically as he
lost the excuse to stay in his camp only observing the enemy. The maréchal was
convinced that he had to conserve the area on the Western banks of the Dender,
because he wanted to get his winter quarters there. Therefore he decided to
cross the Dender and move towards the Senne. The operation started on August 17th
and the army reached the new position between Lippelo and Merchtem. It was
difficult to get foot and fodder in this area. The opponent’s raiding parties
were preventing the inhabitants to bring foot to the French. Especially
Grimbergen seemed to be a centre of allied harassment. Therefor the maréchal
ordered the Liéutenant Général Danois[2] to
take the locality on August 22nd[3].
The combat at
Grimbergen
Danois had an impressive force of 12 battalions
(regiments du Roi, Picardie, Touraine, Royal-Écossais), 20 companies of
grenadiers, 250 men from the Maison du Roi, 500 gendarmes, 500 carabiniers, 4
twelve-pounders and 16 four-pounders departing on the evening of August 22nd
from the camp at Lippelo[4][5].
The Hanoverians have given up the Podenburg Castle early before the fighting. (They were on the table for more historical ambience only - leaving the table quickly.) |
Danois was facing only little resistance, when
he arrived on August 23rd at 6 o’clock a.m. There were two castles
nearby. Both were crewed by troops of the Pragmatic army and both were enclosed
by a moat. One of them occupied by 100 Hanoverian soldiers and 3 officers
capitulated immediately[6].
Now I had to research which castle this could
be. There are many very helpful contemporary maps online from the Moll
collection[7]. Problem
was that the landscape changed dramatically since the 18th century
as most of the area around Brussels is covered now by buildings and little is
visible of the topographic features. Nevertheless Grimbergen is still well known
for numerous very nice castles in the area[8]. Another
problem was that the maps didn’t show roads and hills. Therefore I had to use
the works by Le Rouge[9] and
Seutter[10] to
locate the hillsides and the map by Visscher[11] to
learn about the historical road course. Coming from Lippelo and assuming that
the smaller castle lies near Grimbergen, it seemed to me the most probable
option that the “Podenburg”-castle[12] was
attacked first.
Danois had sent his gendarmes as an outpost
on a ridge towards the Brussel-Scheldt canal. The garrison of the bigger castle
- 60 men of British free companies under the command of captain Ferron -
refused to give up[13].
I suppose that the bigger castle lay more closely
to the ridge and therefor behind Grimbergen, just because the carabiniers on
the ridge south-eastwards are making more sense in this way. The closest castle
on the Southern bank of the river Kelkebeek is the castle of Grimbergen[14].
Although today ruined, the castle still is an impressive architectural
structure. The towers are bigger than those of the Podenburg-castle and an 18th
century engraving of the castle dated from 1770 gives a good impression of the
size of the moat and the towers[15].
The French grenadiers prepared for an assault
on the castle. Danois’s troops brought artillery forward to shoot a breach into
the walls.
The French fusiliers are marching through Grimbergen and along the Kelkebeek. Cumberland's force is just arriving on the heights. |
However meanwhile the duke of Cumberland had
learned about the French advance to Grimbergen and decided to bring help. He
personally led a small detachment of elite troops 2.000 men strong to relieve his
outpost. Cumberland used the road via Vilvoorde. He had 3 battalions of British
guards, 1 battalion of Highlanders, 3 squadrons of Lifeguards, 3 squadrons of
Dutch cavalry, 50 men of pickets, 2 six-pounders and 4 three-pounders[16].
It’s remarkable that he didn’t chose light troops like hussars as his colleague
the Prince of Waldeck did on August 12th[17]. Besides we can notice the same absence of
light troops in Danois’ detachment too. The high quantity of artillery surely
hindered a fast movement. Maybe both commanders wanted to be more prepared for
a serious larger engagement.
Cumberland attacked the gendarmes when he
arrived on the ridge. The carabiniers fled to Grimbergen. The British
positioned their artillery on the ridge line and commenced firing on the French
infantry. The artillery fire and the rout of the gendarmes caused panic among
the infantry in Grimbergen. The French ceased their fire at the castle and
retreated in bad shape[18].
Meanwhile canister fire against the defenders of Grimbergen castle is inflicting some losses. |
We wonder if Danois was not informed about the
small size of Cumberland’s forces or if the often blamed lack of discipline
among the French proved well founded again[19].
The French rearguard formed by the rest of the
French cavalry wanted to offer the retreating infantry a chance to rally behind
them. Although they had to give way hastily too as soon as Cumberland’s
artillery started to fire upon them.
Cumberland didn’t pursuit. Maybe he knew better
than his opponent the real balance of power. He sent some troops to occupy the
smaller castle and the village of Grimbergen again. Then he ordered to march
back behind the canal[20].
Differently to the historical combat the French gendarmarie is successfully rolling back into safety. Cumberland has to react to the French advance and deployment. Is he losing the momentum? |
Although small in size and without significant
losses on both size the encounter at Grimbergen had some consequences. The
maréchal de Saxe had to realize the difficulties of his position and ordered a
retreat of his large army behind the Dender during the September of 1745.
Analysing and
preparing a scenario
It seems obvious to me, that Danois failed in
many respect. He surely didn’t use his cavalry properly. He forgot to send
pickets for reconnaissance duties, although he had plenty of cavalry for the
job. I don’t know where his personal place was during the engagement. But how
could he miss to realize, that his small army was 3 to 4 times larger than
Cumberland’s detachment?
The lack of skills of his sub commanders
perhaps makes the great success of Maurice de Saxe even more impressive. To
defeat his enemy he maybe had a far numerical superior army but he had to
calculate the lack of discipline of his troops as much as the bad performances
of his generals in his plans.
Besides the mentioned maps I had to decide
which leaders were plausible accompanying Danois on one and Cumberland on the
other side.
For the French I used a French order of battle
of 1746 by John Anderson[21]. I
supposed that maybe the brigadiers of the Picardie-, Touraine- and Maison du
Roi brigades were in command.
For the British I could rely again on the same
OOB which I used for Assche already[22]. I
assumed that the commander of the foot guards and the brigadier of the
lifeguards were responsible for the infantry and cavalry.
In our game the French grenadiers not only forced Ferron's troop to leave the Castle but routed them too. |
I included the weakness of the French troops in
my scenario. If I would not adjust in this sense, it would be an easy victory
for the French even with Dithering commanders. Therefor the victory conditions
should effect, that the French player has to be more cautious and compensate
the low skills of his troops.
OOB
Pragmatic "army"
Captain Ferron (Dep.) (60 British skirmishers) - in
the Castle
1 x small inf. (superior)
CinC The duke of Cumberland (Dep.)
1) Brigade of British infantry: Brigardier Churchill
(?) (Dash.)
3 bn.s guard infantry (!) - large/superior
1 bn. highland infantry - large/superior
1 x medium artillery (6-pdr.s)
1 x light artillery (3 pdr.s)
2) independent light inf. (1 piquette of 50 men)
1 x (small) inf. - standard light inf.
3) Brigade of cavalry: Brigadier Crawford
(?) (Dep.)
1 x Brit. guard cavalry (3 sqn. Lifeguards) - superior
1 x Dutch cavalry - standard
BP: 4
FRENCH
CinC Lieut. Gén. de Danois (Dith.)
1) independent - French vanguard on a hill
1 x French horse - large/inferior cavalry (stand.
first round of mellee if charging)
2) French brig. of
infantry: Brigadier Paron (?) (Dith.)
6 x French infantry - stand. (shooting inferior)
2 x French light artillery (4 pdr.s)
3) French brig. of infantry: Brigadier La Ferre
(?) (Dith.)
4x French infantry - stand. (shooting inferior)
2 x French foreign inf. - superior (shooting inferior)
2 x French light artilery (4 pdr.s)
4) French brig. of infantry: Ch. Anne Sigismond de Montmorency-Luxembourg (?) (Dith)
4 x grenadiers (small) - superior (shooting inferior)
5) French rearguard: Brig. St. Clair (?) (Dith.)
1 x Maison du Roi small - standard cav.
1 x French horse - large/inferior cavalry (stand. first round of mellee if charging)
6) independent
1 x French medium artillery (12 pdr.s)
1 x French medium artillery (12 pdr.s)
BP: 4
Victory conditions:
Both sides: breaking the enemy.
Terrain.
Kelkebeek: fordable
Grimbergen: soft cover
Castles: hard cover, movement across the moats
halved[23] /
soft cover if successfully shoot at (roll an additional 5-6 to shoot a breech)
Hills: gentle
Map: André Hanselmann
Photos: André & Cecilia Hanselmann
[1]
Aurel von le
Beau, Rudolf von Hödl: "OESTERREICHISCHER ERBFOLGE-KRIEG 1740-1748. Nach
den Feld -Acten und anderen authentischen Quellen bearbeitet in der
kriegsgeschichtlichen Abtheilung des k. und k. Krieg s - Archivs" Band 9,
Seidel & Sohn, Wien, 1914, p.176
[2] I didn’t found further information
about a Lieutenant Général de Danois at this time. However there was an Augustin-Marie Le Danois, marquis de
Cernay (1710-1784), who was promoted to Lieutenant general in 1749. The post on
the French Wikipedia mentions that he lost an arm at Lauffeldt “en 1745”,
although the battle was in 1747. Therefore maybe he was earlier promoted to
Lieutenant general too. (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustin-Marie_Le_Danois
(checked on August 10th 2020))
[3] Beau/Hödl p. 177
[4]
Beau/Hödl p. 177
[5] There are different spellings of
the town’s name. Beau/Hödl are writing “Liploo”. On modern maps we find
“Lippelo”.
[6]
Beau/Hödl p. 177
[7]
https://mapy.mzk.cz/de/mollova-sbirka/
[8] Along with the local beer and a
very impressive abbey.
[9] Georges-Louis le Rouge: « Carte
Contenant le Pais entre Nieuport l'Ecluse Anvers Ypres et Bruxelles »
from : « Carte des Pais Bas : Contenant la Flandre, le Brabant, Pais
de Liege, et de Namin, le Boulonnois, le Haynaut, et partie de la Picardie »
chez l’Auteur rue des Augustin, Paris, 1744 [Moll-collection]
[10] Matthäus Seutter: « Carte
Particuliere des Environs de Bruxelles avec le Bois Soigne et d'une Partie de
la Flandre jusques Agand » from : « Les provinces des Pais
Bas Autrichiens : contenant en XXIV. Feuilles les Comtées d'Artois, de
Flandres, de Hainaut, de Namur, et les Duchées de Luxembourg, de Limbourg, de
Gueldre et de Brabant, divisées dans ses Baillag: Chatellenies, Quartiers ou
Seigneuries, avec une partie de la France d'Angleterre et du Canal. On y trouve
entre autres marquees toutes les Villes et Chat: fortifiées, qui appartiennent
au Roi de France, a la Maison d'Autriche ou a la Republique de Hollande]. [Sur
la Copie de Bruxelles gravees par Matthieu Seutter Geographe de S.M. Imperiale
a Augsbourg » Augsburg around 1750 [Moll-collection]
[11] Nicolae Jansz Visscher (1749-1702): « Bruxellensis
Tetrarchia in omnes subjacentes ditiones accuratissime divisa / per Nicolaum
Visscher Amst: Bat: ; Nunc apud Petrum apud Petrum Schenk Iun » Amsterdam
[Moll-collection]
[12] Today called Poddegemhoeve.
[13] Beau/Hödl p. 178
[14] Today called Prinsenkasteel.
[15] De Cantillon: „Vermakelykheden van
Brabant en deszelfs onderhoorige Landen“ 1770 [on Wikipedia – checked on August
4th 2020]
[16] Beau/Hödl p. 178
[17] Read here:
https://wackershofenannodomini.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-combat-at-assche-august-12th-1745.html
[18] Beau/Hödl p. 178
[19] The maréchal de Noailles was a
frequent critic of his own troops especially compared with the professionalism
of the Hanoverian and British armies.
[20] Beau/Hödl p. 178
[21] John Anderson: « ORDRE de BATTAILLE des FRANCOIS en MDCCXLVI / S: M: LE
ROY » 1748 or later (Royal Collection RCIN 730061)
[22] Anonymus author: « Ordre de Battaille de l'Armée Alliée en Flandres le 13.me
Juin Anno 1745. / [under the command of] S.A.R. Le Duc de Cumberland »
Royal Collection In. 729118
[23] I suppose that the French had at
least some access to boats or similar vessels to cross the moats. Without such
vessels the whole plan to storm the castle would be somehow strange as there
maybe were wooden bridges.
Nice campaign report Andre. I especially like the research you do for your battles and the logical way you worked out which were the most likely castles referred to in the historical references. Cheers Greg
AntwortenLöschenYeah, the castles were a very imporant aspect when I was creating the scenario with little detailed knowledge in my sources. Maybe some extensive biographies about Cumberland can add more informations about the whole engagement. Many thanks for your kind comment.
LöschenAnother first rate report, Andre’! I enjoyed this battle account very much. You included everything needed for a gamer to replicate your work. Great job!
AntwortenLöschenSurprisingly enough within 4 days this post became the most visited of 2020. Therefore I'm very happy about your comment and your encouragement. I suppose that you will like our next topic too. I'm now off into the Black forest.
Löschen